Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Qt Solution : QPropertyBrowser License question

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    13
    Thanks
    4
    Qt products
    Qt4
    Platforms
    Windows

    Default Qt Solution : QPropertyBrowser License question

    Hello,

    I am using QPropertyBrowser under the LGPL license, and with a dll for the moment. The 'INSTALL.txt' file is not very clear whether you could use this extension with static linking. So, my question is :

    Do I have the right to statically link against QPropertyBrowser with a LGPL license ? Or I must continues using dynamic linking ?

    Thank you in advance,

    ~Darktib

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    2,447
    Thanks
    6
    Thanked 348 Times in 333 Posts
    Qt products
    Qt4
    Platforms
    Windows

    Default Re: Qt Solution : QPropertyBrowser License question

    From what I've read: You can statically link against QPropertyBrowser as long as one of the following is true:
    - You use the commercial version of the component
    - Your application is open-source

    If neither of the above is true, you should stick with the dynamic version.

  3. The following user says thank you to squidge for this useful post:

    Darktib (9th May 2010)

  4. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    13
    Thanks
    4
    Qt products
    Qt4
    Platforms
    Windows

    Default Re: Qt Solution : QPropertyBrowser License question

    Thank you for your quick answer.
    My software is open-source (I am still hesitating on the license, LGPL or zlib).
    I will link statically according to what you've said.

  5. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    4,380
    Thanks
    19
    Thanked 1,005 Times in 913 Posts
    Qt products
    Qt4
    Platforms
    Unix/X11 Windows Symbian S60
    Wiki edits
    5

    Default Re: Qt Solution : QPropertyBrowser License question

    If you develop an open source application can use GPL and LGPL licenced software in any way you want! (If you are not altering the sources. Then you have to publish that changes and say that you have changed it. But normal use: no problems...)

  6. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Warsaw, Poland
    Posts
    33,359
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 5,015 Times in 4,792 Posts
    Qt products
    Qt3 Qt4 Qt5 Qt/Embedded
    Platforms
    Unix/X11 Windows Android Maemo/MeeGo
    Wiki edits
    10

    Default Re: Qt Solution : QPropertyBrowser License question

    Quote Originally Posted by Lykurg View Post
    If you develop an open source application can use GPL and LGPL licenced software in any way you want!
    No, you can't. The licence of your software has to be (L)GPL compatible (not all of them are, there is a list somewhere available) and you have to respect all aspects of the original licence. Let's not confuse "open source" with "public domain".
    Your biological and technological distinctiveness will be added to our own. Resistance is futile.

    Please ask Qt related questions on the forum and not using private messages or visitor messages.


  7. The following user says thank you to wysota for this useful post:

    Darktib (10th May 2010)

  8. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    4,380
    Thanks
    19
    Thanked 1,005 Times in 913 Posts
    Qt products
    Qt4
    Platforms
    Unix/X11 Windows Symbian S60
    Wiki edits
    5

    Default Re: Qt Solution : QPropertyBrowser License question

    Quote Originally Posted by wysota View Post
    No, you can't. The licence of your software has to be (L)GPL compatible
    You are right, I forgott to mention that.

  9. #7
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    13
    Thanks
    4
    Qt products
    Qt4
    Platforms
    Windows

    Default Re: Qt Solution : QPropertyBrowser License question

    Ok, thank you for you answers.
    Currently I am not sure on which license I will use, but I will be LGPL or zlib (and no other license).
    I've checked on the GNU website, zlib is compatible with LGPL.

Similar Threads

  1. Qt License
    By metRo_ in forum Newbie
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 11th April 2010, 22:36
  2. Commercial license vs LGPL license
    By JovianGhost in forum Installation and Deployment
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 5th April 2010, 03:16
  3. Question about the license wizard (example)
    By NoRulez in forum Qt Programming
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 14th August 2009, 10:13
  4. Qt License
    By Frankiee71 in forum Installation and Deployment
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 6th April 2008, 09:38
  5. Replies: 11
    Last Post: 24th March 2006, 06:40

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Digia, Qt and their respective logos are trademarks of Digia Plc in Finland and/or other countries worldwide.