TorAn
27th August 2010, 16:33
:mad:Qt is a great product. It even allows for substition of the Qt solution that never work "out-of-the-box", and I mean QtSoap. I had to quickly hack together the substitute for QtSoap in order to connect to .NET webservice. It took very little (productive) time to do, but much, much, much more time was spent trying to make QtSoap to work.
I am dissapointed at myself for not terminating waste of time with QtSoap and switching to Qt networking classes sooner. But I am still wondering if anyone had an "out-of-the-box" success with QtSoap and .NET webservices? I just can't believe that it is QtSoap problem, after all it was developed by Qt team...
I am dissapointed at myself for not terminating waste of time with QtSoap and switching to Qt networking classes sooner. But I am still wondering if anyone had an "out-of-the-box" success with QtSoap and .NET webservices? I just can't believe that it is QtSoap problem, after all it was developed by Qt team...