myclass::operator==() overload problem.

Hello :)

Qt4.3.1 Open Source Edition for Windows XP (Pro SP2), configured as "-release -shared".

I would like to overload the "==" operator for the objects of my custom class.
Let's have a look to my class :

Code:

---

#ifndef donnee_h
#define donnee_h
 
#include <QList>
#include <QString>
#include <QStringList>
 
class donnee
{
 
public:
	donnee();
 
	bool operator==(const donnee&) const;
 
	QString nom_donnee;						// Nom du répertoire ou du film concerné par la donnée
	QString access_donnee;					// Chemin d'accès au répertoire ou du film concerné par la donnée
	QString type_donnee;					// "Film" ou "Répertoire"
 
    QStringList *liste_noms_des_films;		// Si la donnée est un répertoire
    QStringList *liste_acces_des_films;		// Si la donnée est un répertoire
 
	void trier_listes_des_films();
 
private:
 
};
 
#endif

---

Code:

---

#include <iostream>
using namespace std;
 
#include "donnee.h"
 
donnee::donnee()
{
	nom_donnee = "";
	access_donnee = "";
	type_donnee = "";
 
	liste_noms_des_films 	= new QStringList();
	liste_acces_des_films 	= new QStringList();
}
 
bool donnee::operator==(const donnee &a) const
{
	cout << "OPERATOR: " << a.nom_donnee.toStdString() << "\t" << nom_donnee.toStdString() << endl;
	if (a.nom_donnee != nom_donnee) return 0;
	if (a.access_donnee != access_donnee) return 0;
	if (a.type_donnee != type_donnee) return 0;
	if (a.liste_noms_des_films != liste_noms_des_films) return 0;
	if (a.liste_acces_des_films != liste_acces_des_films) return 0;
	return 1;
}
 
void donnee::trier_listes_des_films()
{	
     QStringList list_temp_films;
     QStringList list_temp_access;
     QString current_name = "";
     QString smallest_name = "";
     int indice_smallest_name;
 
	 // Remplissage de listes temporaires et triées
     int NB_tours = liste_noms_des_films->size();
     for (int i = 0; i < NB_tours; ++i)
     {
         smallest_name = liste_noms_des_films->at(0);
         indice_smallest_name = 0;
 
         for (int j = 0; j < liste_noms_des_films->size(); ++j)
         {
             current_name = liste_noms_des_films->at(j);
 
             if(QString::compare(current_name, smallest_name, Qt::CaseInsensitive) < 0)
             {
                 smallest_name = current_name;
                 indice_smallest_name = j;
             }
         }
         list_temp_films.append(liste_noms_des_films->takeAt(indice_smallest_name));
         list_temp_access.append(liste_acces_des_films->takeAt(indice_smallest_name));
     }
 
     // Mises à jour des listes, à partir des listes temporaires
     liste_noms_des_films->clear();
     for (int k = 0; k < list_temp_films.size(); ++k)
     {
         liste_noms_des_films->append(list_temp_films.at(k));
     }
 
     liste_acces_des_films->clear();
     for (int l = 0; l < list_temp_access.size(); ++l)
     {
         liste_acces_des_films->append(list_temp_access.at(l));
     }
 
}

---

This is a very simple class managing QStrings and QLists of QStrings.
I've reimplemented the "==" operator.

The class is correctly built, and I get no errors or warnings.
So I test my new "==" operator with the 2 following examples :

Code:

---

donnee * data_1 = new donnee();
	 	data_1->nom_donnee = "nom data 1";
	 	data_1->access_donnee = "access data 1";
	 	data_1->type_donnee = "type data 1";
 
	 donnee * data_2 = new donnee();
	 	data_2->nom_donnee = "nom data 1";
	 	data_2->access_donnee = "access data 1";
	 	data_2->type_donnee = "type data 1";	
 
	 if (data_1 == data_2) {cout << "yes" << endl;}
	 else {cout << "no" << endl;}

---

This should display "yes", but it displays "no".

Code:

---

donnee * data_1 = new donnee();
	 	data_1->nom_donnee = "nom data 1";
	 	data_1->access_donnee = "access data 1";
	 	data_1->type_donnee = "type data 1";
 
	 donnee * data_2 = new donnee();
	 	data_2->nom_donnee = "nom data 2";
	 	data_2->access_donnee = "access data 2";
	 	data_2->type_donnee = "type data 2";	
 
	 if (data_1 == data_2) {cout << "yes" << endl;}
	 else {cout << "no" << endl;}

---

This should display "no", and it displays "no".


So my first problem is that my new "==" operator returns always "false".

Another funny thing is that my new "==" operator should display a message on the cout channel each time it is invocated... But this message is never displayed, like if my new operator wasn't used. And you know what ? If I comment my new operator from donnee.h and donnee.cpp, my application is correctly build and executed, without errors or warnings... :eek:

I think I missed something, could you help me please ?
This is my first operator overload :s

You have defined == operator for donnee class, but you're trying to compare pointers.

It should be:

Code:

---

if( *data_1 == *data_2 ) ...

---

Ooooh yes...
Thanks Jacek :o

I've adjusted my operator, in order to correct the error.

Code:

---

bool donnee::operator==(const donnee &a) const
{
	cout << "OPERATOR: " << a.nom_donnee.toStdString() << "\t" << nom_donnee.toStdString() << endl;
	if (a.nom_donnee != nom_donnee) return false;
	if (a.access_donnee != access_donnee) return false;
	if (a.type_donnee != type_donnee) return false;
	if (*a.liste_noms_des_films != *liste_noms_des_films) return false;
	if (*a.liste_acces_des_films != *liste_acces_des_films) return false;
	return true;
}

---

Now that the tests are passed, I want to really use this operator :).

I've got a QList (named "liste_donnees") filled with objects of my donnee class.
I suppose that my QList may contains 2 times the same object, and I would like to clear it in order not to have more than 1 time the same object before displaying its content on my interface.

So I loop into my Qlist, from start index to end index, and I copy my objects in a temporary QList only if the current object isn't already in this temporary QList. This is the reason why I overloaded my "==" operator. (The "contains()" method for QList requiered me to do it...)

Code:

---

QList<donnee *> liste_donnees_temp;
 
     for (int i = 0; i < liste_donnees.size(); ++i)
     {   	 
        	 if (liste_donnees_temp.contains(liste_donnees.at(i)) == false)
        	 {
	         	liste_donnees_temp.append(liste_donnees.at(i));
        	 }
     }

---

The problem is the same as in my previous post : my operator isn't used.
The reason seems to be that the same as previously. So I should modify my code like it :

Code:

---

QList<donnee *> liste_donnees_temp;
 
     for (int i = 0; i < liste_donnees.size(); ++i)
     {   	 
        	 if (liste_donnees_temp.contains(*liste_donnees.at(i)) == false)
        	 {
	         	liste_donnees_temp.append(liste_donnees.at(i));
        	 }
     }

---

But when I do a such modification, the compilator returns me an error :
[no matching function for call 'QList<donnee *>::contains(donnee&)']

Is there a solution ?
Must I search in my "liste_donnees_temp" manually, with a loop for example ?

Thanks for your help !

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Nyphel

if (liste_donnees_temp.contains(*liste_donnees.at(i)) == false)

---

Unfortunately, you can't do that. QList<donnee *> is a list of pointers and you can only check whether it contains a given pointer. In Qt 3 there were special collections for storing pointers, but now they're gone.

It looks like you will have to simply traverse the list and check each item yourself. Something like:

Code:

---

template< class T >
bool contains( QList< T * > list, T * item )
{
   foreach( T * i, list ) {
      if( *i == *item ) {
         return true;
      }
   }
   return false;
}

---

(untested).