class in the class

[baray98]

Guys,

I have some structure definition inside my class and it seems to be c like if your using struct so I want to change my style. but what is the best style to do this.

below is my old code:

class B
{
  public:
    typedef struct s_A
    {
        int X;
        int Y;
        int Z;
    } t_A;
   protected:
   private:
};

class B
{
  public:
    typedef struct s_A
    {
        int X;
        int Y;
        int Z;
    } t_A;
   protected:
   private:
};

To copy to clipboard, switch view to plain text mode 

I want to change this to

class B
{
  public:
    class t_A
    {
      public:
        int X;
        int Y;
        int Z;
    } ;
   protected:
   private:
};

class B
{
  public:
    class t_A
    {
      public:
        int X;
        int Y;
        int Z;
    } ;
   protected:
   private:
};

To copy to clipboard, switch view to plain text mode 

is there any advantage using the old struct vs. the class inside a class style?

i want to still scope the class/struc t_A like below at the end of the day.

B::t_A param;

B::t_A param;

To copy to clipboard, switch view to plain text mode 

baray98

[ChristianEhrlicher]

There's no difference between a class and a struct. And a struct is not 'old' at all (nor deprecated in some way). So I see no problems here

[caduel]

There is a (small) difference: all stuff in a class is private by default, in a struct it's public.