Why is there no qSgn() available?

[Cruz]

While a number of commonly needed basic math functions can be used, such as qSin() or qSqrt(), how come Qt is not offering a qSgn() function to determin the sign of a real?

[boudie]

Thinking about how to implement such function; would it make life easier?

It should return something like Qt::Negative or Qt::Positive or Qt::Zero so you can write:

if (qSign(myNumber) == Qt::Positive) ...

if (qSign(myNumber) == Qt::Positive) ...

To copy to clipboard, switch view to plain text mode 

instead of:

if (myNumber > 0.0) ...

if (myNumber > 0.0) ...

To copy to clipboard, switch view to plain text mode 

I don't think I would use qSign()...

[snapshooter]

Actually the (mathematical) definition of Sgn(x) function is 1 if x > 0, 0 if x=0 and -1 if x < 0. And indeed there are some uses for it.

[seneca]

Actually the (mathematical) definition of Sgn(x) function is 1 if x > 0, 0 if x=0 and -1 if x < 0. And indeed there are some uses for it.

But would the compare with 0 then have to be exact as x == 0.0, or by qFuzzyCompare(x,0.0)?

I think I could not live without two distinct functions then....