QextSerialPort reading error: wrong values

[Lawand]

I'd read everything there is to be read using QIODevice::readAll() and I'd take the last character, not the first one.

This works, thanks
However, is there any more efficient (in terms of complexity) way to do it?, perhaps just clearing the buffer or something like that, because readAll() is taking about 5 seconds to get done (because of low data transfer rate)

BTW, I tried closing and opening the port each time receiveByte() is invoked but I get a wrong value...

[wysota]

The data gets transfered TO the port in a low rate but once it reaches the port (bytesAvailable()>0) it's read from a buffer. So if you experience a delay it might be that there is no data to be read and your read() call blocks until some data is returned. So before reading check if there is anything to be read.

[Lawand]

The data gets transfered TO the port in a low rate but once it reaches the port (bytesAvailable()>0) it's read from a buffer. So if you experience a delay it might be that there is no data to be read and your read() call blocks until some data is returned. So before reading check if there is anything to be read.

I don't thinks so, because once I start the program, bytesAvailable() are 0 then it increases into ~4000 in like 5 or 6 seconds, and it stops there, then when I read a byte it increases again until it reaches ~20000 and stabilizes, henceforth it doesn't increase again until it's less than the first number (~4000).

Note that it takes a fraction of a second to read a byte when the number is around 20000 but it takes about 5 only in the time the number gets below the certain limit (~4000) and the QextSerialPort refills about 16000 bytes...

So, my guess is, it takes a long time for these values to get filled then read.

[wysota]

As far as I remember QExtSerialPort is a stupid class that does not do any buffering on its own and it's only a thin layer over native API. So if you are experiencing such behaviours, they are probably happening in your operating system. In general I'd suggest reading faster so that the system buffers don't get full.

[Lawand]

Thanks for all the info.