Novice
QSharedPointer vs Boost::tr1::shared_ptr()
Our team is looking to standardize use of smart pointers. In reviewing the documentation, it appears that the Qt and the boost::tr1 implemenation are almost identical.
If they are identical, then we would probalby go with the tr1 implementation for code portablity. Can anyone share what differences there are?
The "Q"
Re: QSharedPointer vs Boost::tr1::shared_ptr()
If you are using Qt in your application anyway then portability is not an issue.
Your biological and technological distinctiveness will be added to our own. Resistance is futile.
Please ask Qt related questions on the forum and not using private messages or visitor messages.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks