QCodeEdit

[Methedrine]

Fixed both.

Thanks again :-)

Fixed both.

1. Why don't you want to use the default syntax engine? Wouldn't it be simpler and better to extend it rather than creating another one from scratch ?
2. What exactly do you expect it do do and how much would its internal structure differ from the one of the default syntax engine?

Answers to these would probably help me to change the syntax engine interface to make room for more than one without changing the existing one...

We already wrote one from scratch before you came around with this great edit control. It works like a charm, so far (thread-safe, DFA based, result caching). Qtcentre-member kaos can tell you more about it since, he wrote our parser.
I am also certain that he can give you a better answer to your second question.