QComboBox: setCurrentIndex() is not working?

[vcp]

I agree, but from the standpoint of someone who needs to implement a solution(especially if it depends on your employment, for example.) ,
it will work. Giving space to think of a solution more charm.
That is, "Doing work first!"

[wysota]

I agree, but from the standpoint of someone who needs to implement a solution(especially if it depends on your employment, for example.) ,
it will work. Giving space to think of a solution more charm.
That is, "Doing work first!"

Yes... I have spent really lot of time at work correcting things after people with attitude similar to yours.

[hsechovsky]

Yes... I have spent really lot of time at work correcting things after people with attitude similar to yours.

I hope you accept my question related to your disscussion with a time distance. The solution suggested by vcp is very important for the case, when you want to use combobox for update of the item in a database record. Very often case, when you need to limit the choice of data values by combobox and want to have a single field for the update of the item. It is one of the most frequent and needed cases in db applications. I think vcp found relatively good solution. When you are so sceptic to it, please can you advice more efficient and simpler solution? Thanks in advance for you reply, Hynek.

[ChrisW67]

If there are only a few fixed items then that approach, or the OP's if-else cascade is quite fine.

If the combobox contains 10000 items then a linear search is probably not the quickest option. The more times you have to do this search the more noticeable/significant the slowdown may become. A list like that would likely have to be sorted in order to be usable by a human, and there are faster ways to search in a sorted list (binary search for example). For an unsorted list it may be an option to keep a separate hash map of text to index. As always there is a set of tradeoffs that are partly application specific.