If something doesn't throw exceptions then don't expect to catch one.
The "Q"
Re: Any idea to get a more prowerful try - catch ?
If something doesn't throw exceptions then don't expect to catch one.
Your biological and technological distinctiveness will be added to our own. Resistance is futile.
Please ask Qt related questions on the forum and not using private messages or visitor messages.
Expert
Re: Any idea to get a more prowerful try - catch ?
If you don't know what is going to be thrown how can you possibly catch it? The only real solution is the catch all "catch (...)", but of course you'll get no more information in this case and OS errors (such as memory access violations) are normally not caught unless you use OS specific exception catching.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks