Results 1 to 1 of 1

Thread: Qt Quick, LGPL Dependencies, Lighthouse and a future Qt on iOS

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Brisbane, Australia
    Thanked 1,610 Times in 1,537 Posts
    Qt products
    Qt4 Qt5
    Unix/X11 Windows
    Wiki edits

    Question Qt Quick, LGPL Dependencies, Lighthouse and a future Qt on iOS

    I have a bit of a general rant/query.

    I would love to have a Qt path to iPad because it is simply the most assumed next step for my product (I say "assumed" because I am no longer fielding "Are you going to do an iPad version?" questions, rather "When is your iPad version available?"). I've been watching the use of the Lighthouse as a means of easing the porting Qt GUI to new platforms. I've seen proof-of-concept demos of Qt on iOS devices and things look at least possible.

    However, I see the emphasis on QtDeclarative/QtQuick/QML as the UI tool of choice making this pathway a potential licence-compliance nightmare. Qt Quick has a dependency on QtScript/JavaScriptCore which imposes LGPL licensing even on commercial licence holders. The Apple guidelines require a single binary application: static linking is required to the LGPL libraries. The LGPL requires that the end-user be able to replace the LGPL components themselves, an act that is severely hampered by the locked-down device, and complicated by not having a dynamic linking ability (i.e. I must publish linkable object files or source).

    The push toward this UI mechanism seems to be (further) eroding the value of a commercial licence and hindering access to much desired platforms.

    How do other readers feel about this direction?

  2. The following user says thank you to ChrisW67 for this useful post:

    Xplat (27th November 2011)

Similar Threads

  1. Future of Qt Mobile
    By been_1990 in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 5th July 2011, 00:26
  2. News of future of Qt?
    By budda in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 21st June 2011, 21:37
  3. Future Suggestions
    By qtoptus in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 2nd June 2011, 12:56
  4. Future of Qt Jambi
    By devent in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 2nd August 2009, 16:21
  5. Elegant Qt's future?
    By magland in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 12th June 2007, 20:42

Tags for this Thread


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Digia, Qt and their respective logos are trademarks of Digia Plc in Finland and/or other countries worldwide.