Why prefer scripting instead Qt/C++ on webdevelopment?

[wysota]

So why do you think wt is not a scripting language? Because it uses C++ syntax? And please write proper English sentences instead of that trash talk.

[Alir3z4]

So why do you think wt is not a scripting language? Because it uses C++ syntax?

No it's not just uses C++ syntax, it's uses C++ itself.
And i work with it, write couple of useless examples and play with it.
You see wyosta i can't get your point, can you explain it little bit clearly.

[wysota]

No it's not just uses C++ syntax, it's uses C++ itself.

If you compile it yourself into a library/executable, then fine, it may or may not be a scripting language. However the sole fact of compiling (or not) doesn't determine if something is a scripting environment or not. Considering the fact that you are generating some kind of "script" that later gets translated to html/javascript, I would argue that it has some notions of scripting environments.

[Alir3z4]

Yes of course i'd compiled it on my machine, actually i wasn't successful to found binary package for distro.( despite that i found that after a while on archlinux repository )
i'd use it like Qt libraries, include.. and other stuff
Couple of month ago i post a new topic on wt forums about a scripting template language shortage. [topic link], but the answers isn't too helpful, maybe i don't get the way of wt.
BTW why anybody want to make a scripting language with C++ syntax style like ?

[wysota]

BTW why anybody want to make a scripting language with C++ syntax style like ?

Why not? I have seen (or at least heard about) at least two interpreted languages using the C syntax and they were both very successful in their domains. A syntax is just a syntax.

[Alir3z4]

Why not? I have seen (or at least heard about) at least two interpreted languages using the C syntax and they were both very successful in their domains. A syntax is just a syntax.

This one is interesting.
maybe i didn't made my point clear