Yes
Yes (another plugin using the same folders and such works just fine with no issues.)
Yes (as can be seen by using the dependency walker on it and examining the functions it contains) (also, I corrected it as per the other thread)
EDIT:
After some digging it turns out (I never realized) that declaring Q_OBJECT happens to include a boatload of functions; this function that has no definition is one of those functions. Is this just a random bug that I'll have to work around? Maybe building a new class with the same functionality would work..?
Bookmarks