I have built Qt statically with Visual Studio 2010 and found that I cannot use it to make any shared library(dll), is this by design?
Novice
Building shared lib with statically built Qt
I have built Qt statically with Visual Studio 2010 and found that I cannot use it to make any shared library(dll), is this by design?
Expert
Re: Building shared lib with statically built Qt
yes. Why don't you think about what you are trying to do
If you have a problem, CUT and PASTE your code. Do not retype or simplify it. Give a COMPLETE and COMPILABLE example of your problem. Otherwise we are all guessing the problem from a fabrication where relevant details are often missing.
Novice
Re: Building shared lib with statically built Qt
So if Qt was built statically, then any library(even those that don't depends on Qt at all) that use such Qt build can only output static library?Originally Posted by amleto
yes. Why don't you think about what you are trying to do
My problem is that under the same source tree, I have libraries that will be statically linked to Qt, while others, are intended to be pure C++ shared library, and they are all managed by .pro files
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks