I'd rather not use QStandardItemModel because I already have my own tree implementation. Unless I'm missing something, using QStandardItemModel would mean that I'd have to take all the nodes from my tree and put them into QStandardItems. That would result in two different tree representations of the same data.
I'm aware of the methods I need to implement, but obviously I must be doing something wrong. Anyways, I'll give it another shot tomorrow and post my results here...
Bookmarks