I wasn't saying that there is no need to be acidid, i was merely pointing out that the Qt Solutions link had no download link whatsoever, yet Wysota et. al. seemed to be saying that it is easy to find said download link and that you're an idiot if you don't know what "Qt Solutions" are.
Of course, that does not excuse Franco from completely ignoring the git link that was posted later, and saying that we have not helped him.
If you work your way up the URL that was given, eventually you end up at doc.qt.nokia.com where above the expression "Solutions for Qt" there is this big header "Addons" and "Components and Addons for Qt" which clearly marks this is not part of Qt. Of course it requires elementary curiosity and technical skills to reach this page and this conclusion but can you expect less from a person who has been profesionally developing with Qt for over three years?
And one more thing, I never said the URL had a download link anywhere so please don't include my name in a sentence stating so.
And to use one of the nice things available: http://lmgtfy.com?q=QtSingleApplication+download
Oh... and a "Did you know" tip for today:
Did you know that classes that are part of Qt have the prefix Q and classes that are not part of Qt but are developed by Qt developers have the prefix Qt?
Bookmarks