About buffers, iostream objects, and files.

[tonnot]

I want to use iostream to read write data into memory, but I dont know how to .
I lose myself with the way to create the io instance, asociate initial memory, etc.
Basically I'd want to create a vector of io elements, on each vector I want to select the io object and then read - write data of any kind.

I want to have the benefits of to use the 'write', put, seek, << , ><, etc.
But the iostream ask me for a streambuf iostream (streambuf * sb);, and this element only let me to use filebuf and stringbuf :
This is an abstract base class, therefore no objects can be directly instantiated from it. The standard hierarchy defines two classes derived from this one that can be used to directly instantiate objects: filebuf and stringbuf.

So, my question is 'can I use this to work in memory' ? stringbuf is the way ?
Thanks

[wysota]

I want to use iostream to read write data into memory, but I dont know how to .

You are missing my point. You waste your time trying to use a stream in a non-streaming way. Choosing a particular approach over another has to be backed up by some evidence that there is a benefit of choosing this particular approach. You want to write binary data, you will not have any benefits from using streams. At least none that I see.

Basically I'd want to create a vector of io elements, on each vector I want to select the io object and then read - write data of any kind.

So far you are writing binary data, not "data of any kind".

But the iostream ask me for a streambuf iostream (streambuf * sb);, and this element only let me to use filebuf and stringbuf :

So subclass streambuf and create your own buffer type by implementing pure virtual methods.

[tonnot]

Thanks wy.
I have searched information about subclass streambuf. I dont find useful information.
I fear to 'reinvent' the wheel.
I dont understand why is so difficult to find a standard way to do what I want.
Thanks again.

[squidge]

I dont understand why is so difficult to find a standard way to do what I want.

Simply put, there isn't a standard way of reading/writing "data of any kind" (apart from the non-stream read/write methods). The standards only apply to data of known types. If you really want to handle "data of any kind" in a stream based manor, then you need to define your own methods for each kind of data, as already suggested.